AIN’T THINK

  1. protects mental privacy & cognitive liberty
  2. prevents the indiscriminate leakage of brain data across the info-sphere
  3. prevents someone from having mind read without consent
  4. denial of reason to give away your skull-bone
  5. we have the right to refuse coercive uses of neurotechnology
  6. absolute rights include freedom of thought & conscience

mind reading & mind hacking:

  1. violates article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
  2. violates European Convention on Human Rights
  3. violates the 5th Amendment’s right to not self incriminate
  4. mental decoders, brain printers & thought-to-text converters – violate privacy laws & private property rights & copyright infringement
  5. violates the right to mental privacy
  6. thought recordings and reproduction devices – violate privacy laws & private property rights & copyright infringement

 

24 november 2017

Legal advice & project stamps 2017-2020

Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology – Roberto Andorno & Marcello Ienca 2017

 

ain’t think – project stamps 2017-2020

do not follow my thoughts – follow cavitas oris

by cavitas-oris 2019